I underwrote a $56M multifamily in Houston, Texas.
Site work is ahead of schedule, and permitting came in $1M under budget before any units break ground.
- 309 units, garden-style, 3-story.
- Market rent: $2.00/SF, $1,810/unit avg.
- Experienced developer, proven track record.
- 20K+ new jobs by 2028 (Chevron anchor).
- Greater Houston rents up 42% last 5 years.
- 24-month exit window to refinance.
- Zoned to top school district, energy corridor.
This is a309-unit ground-up development in Northwest Houston by an experienced local developer targeting stabilisation in 2028. The thesis: supply-constrained market, 20k new jobs anchoring demand, operator with execution track record.
To fund deals like this, I always ask 4 questions:
1) What stage of risk are we in?
- Ground-up construction through stabilization.
- Permits and construction docs already closed.
- Hard costs locked via fixed-price GC contract.
2) What makes the location work?
- 20K+ jobs arriving 2028–2030.
- 42% rent growth over past 5 years.
- 1M+ residents within 5-mile radius.
- No major competing supply pipeline.
3) How is the downside protected?
- 8–10% preferred return shields exit timing risk.
- Soft costs came in $1M under budget.
- Site running ahead of schedule.
- Sponsor holds 10% co-invest (aligned).
4) Can we control the exit?
- Refinance at stabilisation is base case.
- 24-month window (tight but executable)
- Fundamentals support rent growth.
- Operator has managed similar exits.
The deal assumes 20k jobs arrive on schedule by 2028–2030. Job delay or underperformance tightens rent assumptions and extends hold past 24 months.
My verdict:
Institutions: Weak fit
Private Credit: Strong fit
Family Offices: Strong fit
If you allocate to real assets, let's connect 👋

